A System on Chip (SoC) design, as seen in Apple’s M-series processors, integrates multiple computing components—including the CPU, GPU, Neural Engine, unified memory, storage controllers, and other specialized accelerators—onto a single chip. This approach enhances performance, power efficiency, and thermal management by reducing data transfer latency and optimizing workflows between different components. Unlike traditional architectures that rely on separate chips for processing and graphics, Apple’s M-series SoCs leverage a unified memory architecture (UMA), allowing all processing units to access the same high-bandwidth, low-latency memory pool. This results in seamless multitasking, improved AI processing, and exceptional power efficiency, making it ideal for MacBooks, iMacs, and iPads.
Upgrading from an Intel-based Mac to an M-series Mac brings massive improvements in performance, battery life, and efficiency. Apple Silicon chips (M1, M2, M3, M4) are faster, run cooler, and use less power, meaning you get longer battery life (often double or more compared to Intel models). Macs with M-series chips also run silently because they produce less heat, reducing the need for loud fans.
Apps launch quicker, multitasking is smoother, and macOS is optimized specifically for Apple Silicon, ensuring better responsiveness and future software support.
Additionally, M-series Macs can run some iPhone and iPad apps (if the developers have enabled it), they also have stronger security features like the Secure Enclave, and include a powerful Neural Engine for AI-related tasks.
Apple has also stopped updating macOS for older Intel Macs, meaning you may miss out on future macOS updates and features. If you want a future-proof Mac with better performance, efficiency, and software longevity, upgrading to Apple Silicon is a smart move.
1. Power Efficiency
- Better Performance per Watt
- Intel’s chips, especially in MacBooks, struggled with power efficiency.
- Apple Silicon (starting with M1) delivers better performance with significantly lower power consumption, leading to:
- Longer battery life (e.g., MacBook Air M1 doubled battery life compared to Intel models).
- Less heat generation, reducing the need for fans.
2. Performance Gains
- Unified Memory Architecture (UMA)
- Apple Silicon integrates CPU, GPU, and RAM on a single chip, allowing for faster memory access and reducing bottlenecks.
- High Single-Core and Multi-Core Speeds
- M-series chips outperform Intel counterparts in both single-threaded and multi-threaded tasks.
- Faster GPU Performance
- Apple’s integrated GPUs rival dedicated graphics in Intel-based Macs, making them ideal for creative professionals.
3. Control Over Hardware and Software
- Vertical Integration
- Apple designs both hardware (M-series chips) and software (macOS), optimizing performance and efficiency.
- Unlike Intel chips, which require Apple to adapt macOS around them, Apple can now design macOS directly for Apple Silicon.
4. Intel’s Slow Innovation & Delays
- Intel struggled with chip advancements and suffered from delays in process node improvements (stuck on 14nm for years while Apple moved to 5nm and beyond).
- Apple wanted faster improvements and greater flexibility.
5. Fanless MacBooks
- Better Thermal Design
- Apple Silicon runs so efficiently that MacBook Air M1/M2/M3 don’t need fans, making them completely silent.
- Even MacBook Pros with fans run much quieter than Intel versions.
6. iOS/iPadOS App Compatibility
- Apple Silicon Macs can run iPhone and iPad apps natively, bridging the gap between macOS and iOS.
- This wouldn’t be possible on Intel-based Macs.
7. Future Scalability & Customization
- Apple can now develop chips tailored for specific Mac models, from MacBook Air to Mac Pro, without relying on Intel’s roadmap.
Downsides of the Transition
- Intel-based Mac apps require Rosetta 2 for translation (though Apple did an excellent job making it seamless).
- Boot Camp (Windows on Mac) is no longer supported, since Windows ARM support is limited.
Conclusion
Apple moved away from Intel to increase performance, battery life, and efficiency, while also gaining full control over its chip development. The success of the M1, M2, M3, and now M4 chips has shown that this was the right move, with massive gains over Intel-based Macs.
Introduced in May 2024, the M4 is built using TSMC’s second-generation 3-nanometer process and contains 28 billion transistors. It features a 10-core CPU configuration with up to four performance cores and six efficiency cores, along with a 10-core GPU and a 16-core Neural Engine capable of performing up to 38 trillion operations per second.
The M4 chip debuted in the seventh-generation iPad Pro and has since been integrated into various Apple devices, including the iMac, Mac Mini, and MacBook Pro. More recently, Apple updated the MacBook Air lineup to include the M4 chip, offering enhanced performance and efficiency.
In October 2024, Apple expanded the M4 lineup with the introduction of the M4 Pro and M4 Max variants. The M4 Pro offers up to a 14-core CPU and a 20-core GPU, while the M4 Max features up to a 16-core CPU and a 40-core GPU, catering to users requiring higher performance for demanding tasks.
Apple announced the Mac Studio M4 Max on March 5, 2025. The new Mac Studio featuring the M4 Max and M3 Ultra chips was unveiled during a press release on this date. Apple introduced it as “the most powerful Mac ever,” with pre-orders starting immediately and availability beginning on March 12, 2025
Overall, the M4 series continues Apple’s trend of integrating high-performance, energy-efficient SoCs across its product range, enhancing both computing power and battery life in its devices.
The M4 chip is built on TSMC’s second-generation 3nm process, making it more power-efficient and faster than previous Apple Silicon chips. It introduces an upgraded 10-core CPU with improved performance and efficiency cores, along with a Neural Engine capable of 38 trillion operations per second, enhancing AI tasks. Unlike previous chips, the M4 features a new GPU architecture with hardware-accelerated ray tracing, improving graphics performance. Additionally, it is the first ARMv9.2-A-based Apple Silicon, bringing better security, memory optimizations, and future-proofing over its predecessors.
The base M4 Mac mini delivers substantial performance improvements over earlier models, with Apple claiming up to 1.5× faster CPU performance compared to the M2. In Geekbench tests, it achieved a multi-core score of 21,935, surpassing all other Macs except those equipped with the M4 Max.
However, when compared to previous “Pro” level chips like the M1 Pro, the performance varies depending on the workload. In CPU-intensive tasks, the M4 often outperforms the M1 Pro, but for GPU-intensive applications, the M1 Pro’s higher GPU core count may provide better performance. Therefore, while the M4 Mac mini offers impressive advancements, its suitability as an upgrade depends on the specific apps and workflow performed by different users.
Apple released the M3 Ultra instead of the M4 Ultra for several reasons, according to speculation and information from Apple:
-
UltraFusion technology: The M4 Max chip reportedly lacks the UltraFusion connector needed to combine two chips into an Ultra variant2. This technological limitation prevented Apple from creating an M4 Ultra.
-
Deliberate strategy: Apple told journalists that not every chip generation will include an “Ultra” tier1. This suggests a planned approach to chip releases rather than a technical limitation.
-
Production challenges: Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman reported that Apple is reluctant to develop an M4 Ultra chip from scratch due to production challenges, costs, and the relatively small sales volume of its desktop computers2.
-
Hybrid approach: The M3 Ultra is described as a cross between M3 and M4 technologies, featuring Thunderbolt 5 support and up to 512GB of unified memory, which are improvements over the M3 Max46.
-
Performance considerations: Despite being based on the M3 architecture, the M3 Ultra still outperforms the M4 Max in certain areas, particularly in GPU-intensive tasks4.
This approach allows Apple to offer a high-performance option while potentially aligning future Ultra chip releases with specific product launches, such as an updated Mac Pro2.
Citations:
- https://www.macrumors.com/2025/03/05/apple-explains-lack-of-m4-ultra-chip/
- https://www.macrumors.com/2025/03/09/m4-ultra-chip-is-unlikely/
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8J0C1wFSSWE
- https://www.techradar.com/computing/macs/apple-mac-studio-m3-ultra
- https://www.macworld.com/article/2634020/apples-m3-ultra-chip-is-more-than-it-appears-to-be.html
- https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2025/03/apple-reveals-m3-ultra-taking-apple-silicon-to-a-new-extreme/
- https://bgr.com/tech/inside-apples-new-m3-ultra-processor/
- https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/heres-why-apple-is-unlikely-to-release-an-m4-ultra-chip-for-macs.2452630/
- https://www.theverge.com/news/624193/apple-mac-studio-m4-max-m3-ultra-launch-price-specs-availability
- https://arstechnica.com/civis/threads/m4-max-and-m3-ultra-mac-studio-review-a-weird-update-but-it-mostly-works.1506118/
- https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2025/03/apple-unveils-new-mac-studio-the-most-powerful-mac-ever/
- https://www.reddit.com/r/apple/comments/1j43qff/apple_reveals_m3_ultra_taking_apple_silicon_to_a/
- https://www.reddit.com/r/apple/comments/1j3icnn/mac_studio_with_m4_max_and_m3_ultra_chips_could/
The primary difference between Apple’s iPhone Bionic chips (A-series) and M-series chips lies in their design focus and intended use cases. The A-series chips, such as the A14 or A16 Bionic, are optimized for mobile devices like iPhones and consumer iPads, prioritizing energy efficiency and compact size to maximize battery life. They feature fewer high-performance cores and smaller GPU configurations compared to the M-series, which are designed for Macs and iPads with higher performance demands.
Mid to high end iPads such as the Air and Pro models use M-series chips though. The newest Mac mini uses the A17 pro.
M-series chips, like the M1 or M2, build upon the same architecture as their A-series counterparts but include more CPU and GPU cores, larger caches, higher memory bandwidth, and support for unified memory, making them better suited for intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering. Additionally, M-series chips often include specialized components such as media engines and higher-speed memory interfaces that are absent in A-series chips. This distinction reflects Apple’s strategy of tailoring its silicon to the specific needs of each device category.
Citations:
- https://macpaw.com/reviews/difference-m1-m2-chip
- https://www.macrumors.com/guide/apple-silicon-buyers-guide/
- https://www.techinsights.com/blog/two-new-apple-socs-two-market-events-apple-a14-and-m1
- https://www.trustedreviews.com/versus/apple-a16-bionic-vs-apple-m1-4265201
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_silicon
- https://www.reddit.com/r/ipad/comments/myphom/what_is_the_difference_between_an_a_series_chip/
- https://www.macworld.com/article/556384/apple-processors-pro-max-ultra-iphone-ipad-mac-benchmarks.html
- https://discussions.apple.com/thread/253152468
On Apple silicon (SoCs like the M1, M2, M3, and M4 series), binned and non-binned chips refer to different versions of the same processor, where some chips have certain cores disabled or perform slightly differently due to the manufacturing process.
Binned vs. Non-Binned Chips
-
Binned Chips
- These are chips that did not fully meet the highest performance or efficiency standards during manufacturing.
- Some CPU or GPU cores may be disabled to ensure stability, reducing power consumption and cost.
- Apple sells these chips at a lower price, often in base models of MacBooks, iPads, or Mac Minis.
-
Non-Binned Chips
- These are fully functional chips with all cores active, meaning they meet the highest quality standards.
- They offer the best performance in terms of CPU, GPU, and power efficiency.
- Typically found in higher-end models or as an upgrade option.
Example of Binning in Apple Chips
-
M2 Pro Chip
- Binned Version: 10-core CPU (6 performance + 4 efficiency cores), 16-core GPU
- Non-Binned Version: 12-core CPU (8 performance + 4 efficiency cores), 19-core GPU
-
M3 Pro Chip
- Binned Version: 11-core CPU, 14-core GPU
- Non-Binned Version: 12-core CPU, 18-core GPU
Why Does Apple Bin Chips?
- Yield Efficiency: Not all chips come out perfect; rather than discarding partially faulty ones, Apple disables underperforming cores and sells them at a lower tier.
- Market Segmentation: Offers multiple price points for different users.
Learn how we use the benchmarks.